|
1
|
- The AFO Air Emissions Consent Agreement and Final Order
|
|
2
|
- Background information
- Federal Register Notice
- Components of the Agreement
- Eligible participants
- Applicable requirements
- Covenant not to sue
- Monitoring program
|
|
3
|
- EPA & USDA asked National Academy of Science (NAS) to conduct the
AFO air emissions study
- NAS study conclusions:
- No reliable emission factors for AFO exist
- Additional data needed to develop estimating methodologies
- Current methods for estimating emissions not appropriate
- Use process-based approach
|
|
4
|
- Consent agreement developed in response to:
- Public concerns
- NAS report
- Consent agreement developed by:
- EPA
- Industry representatives
- Proposed agreement coordinated with:
- Agricultural industry representatives
- State & local government officials
- Environmental organizations
- Citizen groups
|
|
5
|
- Signed on Jan. 21, 2005
- Published on Jan. 31, 2005
- “Initial” public comment period closed on March 2, 2005
- Re-opening comment period from April 1 through May 2, 2005
- Extending signup period to July 1, 2005
- Information available at:
- www.epa.gov/fedrgstr
- www.epa.gov/airlinks/airlinks1.html
|
|
6
|
- Eligible participants
- Contract growers
- Integrators
- Targeted AFO sectors
- Initial 90-day signup period extended 60 days to July 1, 2005
|
|
7
|
- Affect EPA’s ability to respond to endangerment to public health,
welfare or the environment
- Provide protection from criminal violations of environmental laws
- Affect compliance by AFOs with any requirement of the Clean Water Act
- Affect States’ or citizens’ ability to enforce compliance with State
laws
|
|
8
|
- Pay a civil penalty (per farm)
- Contribute to nationwide emissions monitoring study
- Make farms available for monitoring
- Apply emissions estimating methodologies developed by EPA to identify
applicable Clean Air Act (CAA); Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA); and Emergency Planning and
Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) requirements
- Certify compliance with CAA permitting and CERCLA and EPCRA notification
provisions
|
|
9
|
- Penalty is based on the number and size of farms
- Penalty ranges from $200 - $1000 per farm
- Penalty cap
- $10,000 for 1-10 farms
- $30,000 for 11-50 farms
- $60,000 for 51-100 farms
- $80,000 for 101-150 farms
- $90,000 for 151-200 farms
- $100,000 for more than 200 farms
- These funds go to the US Treasury and not to EPA and are not used to
fund the monitoring study
|
|
10
|
- A limited covenant not to sue for past violations of:
- CAA permitting requirements in Title V, and Title I, and SIPs arising
from emissions from animal confinement structures and agricultural
livestock waste lagoons
- CERCLA and EPCRA hazardous substance reporting requirements
|
|
11
|
- Does not cover emissions from sources not participating in the agreement
- Allows EPA to prosecute cases that present endangerment to human health
- Applies only to past violations and terminates shortly after monitoring
study is complete
- Covers only violations related to emissions from agricultural waste at
emission units located at participating farms
|
|
12
|
- Does not cover land application or other sources
- Does not affect permit requirements for new or modified sources
- Nullified if AFO fails to comply with State nuisance orders
- AFO subject to certain Federal or State enforcement actions may not be
eligible
|
|
13
|
- AFO installing waste-to-energy emission control systems get additional
time to apply for air permits
- Complements research into AFO air emissions to improve air quality
|
|
14
|
- Information available at:
- www.epa.gov/fedrgstr
- www.epa.gov/airlinks/airlinks1.html
- Sign and return
- The Consent Agreement
- Farm Information & Emission Unit Information Sheets
- Mail to EPA
- Signup period ends July 1, 2005
|
|
15
|
- Name and address of signer
- Name of owner and operator of each facility covered by the Agreement
- Location of all covered facilities
- Type and number of animal housing structures
- Type of manure handling system and number of manure storage areas
- Capacity and surface area of all manure storage areas
- Description of any emission control technology or nontraditional manure
treatment system
|
|
16
|
- Purpose: gather data for developing emission estimating methodologies
- Funding provided by participating AFO
- Monitor for:
- Particulate matter
- Hydrogen sulfide
- Volatile organic compounds
- Ammonia
- Monitoring anticipated to begin in early 2006 and continue for 2 years
- Data made available to the public
|
|
17
|
- Focuses on three AFO sectors
- Types of operations
- Regional representation of AFO
- Number of farms monitored depends on the number and type of
participating AFO
|
|
18
|
- Funds provided by participants
- Participant pays either
- $2500 per farm, or
- Pro rata share of the “Full Funding Level”
- Funds are paid into a non-profit entity
- Non-profit entity hires an independent monitoring contractor
|
|
19
|
- Monitoring plan:
- Identifies the Independent Monitoring Contractor (IMC) &
qualifications
- Includes a Quality Assurance plan
- Identifies emissions to be monitored
- Identifies farms to be monitored
- EPA has 30 days to approve plan
- IMC has 30 days to modify and resubmit a plan disapproved by EPA
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- Develop & submit monitoring plan
- Submit quarterly reports
- Conduct periodic meetings
- Notify EPA of any problems
|
|
22
|
- National Academy of Sciences developed recommendations to characterize
all AFO processes
- Consent Agreement/Monitoring Study is just one piece of overall strategy
- Farming operations both small and large will benefit from representation
in monitoring study so that their processes are included
- Air Office plans to issue strategy covering, but not limited to:
- Regulations and/or guidance
- Conservation practices (best management practices, technologies)
- Emission estimating methodologies – short term
- Process based emission model – long term
- Outreach
|
|
23
|
- Developing guidance and/or regulations is designed to minimize the
impact of animal agriculture on air quality
- Size of farms regulated could cover small to large, depending on whether
the operation is in a nonattainment area
- Collecting as much data as possible ensures guidance and/or regulations
will reflect realities of various farming operations
|
|
24
|
- Emission estimating methodologies will be published within 18 months
after completion of the monitoring study
- Actual guidance and/or regulations will be a 3-to-5 year process, but
will be concurrently developed with the monitoring study under the
consent agreement
|
|
25
|
- Consent Agreement:
- Bruce Fergusson, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA),
202/564-1261, fergusson.bruce@epa.gov
- Monitoring Study:
- Sharon Nizich, Office of Air and Radiation (OAR), 919/541-2825,
nizich.sharon@epa.gov
- Air Issues:
- Robin Dunkins, OAR, 919/541-5335, dunkins.robin@epa.gov
- Bill Schrock, OAR, 919/541-5032, schrock.bill@epa.gov
- Sharon Nizich, OAR, 919/541-2825, nizich.sharon@epa.gov
|